Difference between revisions of "Jtm-sv-links"

From Media Giraffe
Jump to: navigation, search
(BACKGROUND)
(NEWS)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
<hr>
 
<hr>
  
 +
<hr>A [http://www.mediagiraffe.org/wiki/index.php/Jtm-dc-links page of reference links] prepared for Journalism That Matters: The DC Sessions may be a helpful starting point.<hr>
 
===NEWS===
 
===NEWS===
*01-25-08 / [http://www.acmecoalition.org/bill_densmore/25012008/least_160_gathering_strategy_summit_plan_end_run_corporate_media At least 150 activists gather in Santa Cruz to plan end-run of "corporate media"]
+
*01-25-08 / [http://newshare.typepad.com/mediagiraffe/2008/01/up-to-100-gathe.html Progressive/left seeks to form alternative aggregation news website]
  
 
*01-25-08 / [http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4458 American Journalism Review backgrounder on philanthropic/foundation funding of journalism]
 
*01-25-08 / [http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4458 American Journalism Review backgrounder on philanthropic/foundation funding of journalism]
Line 25: Line 26:
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 +
 
===BACKGROUND===
 
===BACKGROUND===
 
* 01-14-08 / [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jan/14/facebook/print A review of Facebook] / Tom Hodgkinson writing at The Guardian online:<br>
 
* 01-14-08 / [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jan/14/facebook/print A review of Facebook] / Tom Hodgkinson writing at The Guardian online:<br>
 
**''Now, by comparision with Facebook, newspapers, for example, begin to look hopelessly outdated as a business model. A newspaper sells advertising space to businesses looking to sell stuff to their readers. But the system is far less sophisticated than Facebook for two reasons. One is that newspapers have to put up with the irksome expense of paying journalists to provide the content. Facebook gets its content for free. The other is that Facebook can target advertising with far greater precision than a newspaper. Admit on Facebook that your favourite film is This Is Spinal Tap, and when a Spinal Tap-esque movie comes out, you can be sure that they'll be sending ads your way.''
 
**''Now, by comparision with Facebook, newspapers, for example, begin to look hopelessly outdated as a business model. A newspaper sells advertising space to businesses looking to sell stuff to their readers. But the system is far less sophisticated than Facebook for two reasons. One is that newspapers have to put up with the irksome expense of paying journalists to provide the content. Facebook gets its content for free. The other is that Facebook can target advertising with far greater precision than a newspaper. Admit on Facebook that your favourite film is This Is Spinal Tap, and when a Spinal Tap-esque movie comes out, you can be sure that they'll be sending ads your way.''

Revision as of 15:55, 4 February 2008

jtmsv.jpg NewsTools2008: A concept/design mashup for journalists, technologists and entrepreneurs

Pre-convening news and reference links

compiled/suggested by JTM participants


WHO'S PARTICIPATING? / EVENT BLOG / PROGRAM / BREAKOUT TOPICS / APPLICATION / GOALS / INITIAL PLANNING / DC SESSIONS / LODGING /ABOUT US MORE INFO/REGISTER NOW



A page of reference links prepared for Journalism That Matters: The DC Sessions may be a helpful starting point.

NEWS


BACKGROUND

  • 01-14-08 / A review of Facebook / Tom Hodgkinson writing at The Guardian online:
    • Now, by comparision with Facebook, newspapers, for example, begin to look hopelessly outdated as a business model. A newspaper sells advertising space to businesses looking to sell stuff to their readers. But the system is far less sophisticated than Facebook for two reasons. One is that newspapers have to put up with the irksome expense of paying journalists to provide the content. Facebook gets its content for free. The other is that Facebook can target advertising with far greater precision than a newspaper. Admit on Facebook that your favourite film is This Is Spinal Tap, and when a Spinal Tap-esque movie comes out, you can be sure that they'll be sending ads your way.